Store
Subscribe
Gamemodes when hosting UHC's

CameraLagg wrote

I disagree. This way it would always be cutclean.


Edit; Also, this reply is for @sluttycow since I forgot to quote him.

There doesn't need to be a cutclean or any other gamemode always in the pole…

This is how strawpolls would look like (just an example);

1) http://strawpoll.me/4568817

2) http://strawpoll.me/4568827

3) http://strawpoll.me/4568845
 0
PM Link
You don't get it. To2s are already done so much so we need some to4/5s as they are tons of fun for people with large friend groups. FFAs are always nice as it tests the skill of one player alone which is why that's the most commonly hosted. Cut cleans are for quick surface side fights but annoyingly people see that as a quicker efficient UHC which is basically just a quick 0 0 mashup. Diamond less are for people who don't quite frankly like uhc. Am I saying Uhc players shouldn't like diamondless? No I'm just saying pvp oriented players will always vote diamondless due to that being the least caving based. Different crowds like different game modes, but right now all will be cutclean and diamondless meaning the UHC oriented community will leave.
 0
PM Link
I skipped through a whole load of the responses just so I could leave my reply on this, so excuse me if I repeat anything anyone else said.
Having a strawpoll for every match would be too overpowered, I can understand if for strength, because that is more flexible, but whole gamemodes aren't really. But I don't think too secluded, maybe there could be a thing on the match post where if the host wants to they can post a strawpoll along with the game mode? So if somebody is hosting an FFA, along with the time, host, and game mode, they could put "[strawpoll link here]" and then have it that way. But that would be optional, just to make it so cut clean isn't put on every game, like hosts do with strength.
 0
PM Link

PersonKool wrote

You don't get it. To2s are already done so much so we need some to4/5s as they are tons of fun for people with large friend groups. FFAs are always nice as it tests the skill of one player alone which is why that's the most commonly hosted. Cut cleans are for quick surface side fights but annoyingly people see that as a quicker efficient UHC which is basically just a quick 0 0 mashup. Diamond less are for people who don't quite frankly like uhc. Am I saying Uhc players shouldn't like diamondless? No I'm just saying pvp oriented players will always vote diamondless due to that being the least caving based. Different crowds like different game modes, but right now all will be cutclean and diamondless meaning the UHC oriented community will leave.


There would be strawpolls! And on those strawpolls, there DOESN'T ALWAYS need to be CC or Diamondless as an option. Put 5 Vanilla options (teams, small team, big team, ffa, rush)… So people can choose between those vanilla gamemodes. ;)
 0
PM Link
Or you could have a selection of 2
Vote diamondless
Vote CutClean

Or sometimes
Vote Vanilla
Vote Diamondless

So it isn't the same all the time 😊
@sluttycow
 0
PM Link
Most players plan their games based on gamemode, FFA/teams and it would be too chaotic if nobody knew until pretty much last minute.

I think a solution/compromise could be to host a "player choice" game maybe once a day where the players could vote for gamemode and other options like strength on or off.
 0
PM Link
I agree there should atleast be a players choice game, maybe a 5pm game for eu so alot of people can play it after school and a na game for them so 9pm game or something like that.
 0
PM Link