Store
Subscribe
276 man Red VS Blue?
276 Red VS Blue FFA Scatter would be fun. With a scoreboard of how many people are left in each team.
 0
PM Link
# @sluttycow @MasterGberry @Archybot @frogmike
 0
PM Link
What?
 0
PM Link
nice tag spam and what
 0
PM Link
@MasterGberry @Thnk red vs blue is where its like half the people in the game vs half the people in the game so a 276 people game would be 138 (red) vs 138 (blue). But everyone would be scattered like it was an FFA game.

And with a scoreboard that says something like
EX:

Badlion
Time In: 1:05:05
Players Left: 139/276
Blue Players Left: 39
Red Players Left: 100
Your kills: 4
 0
PM Link
sounds fun…. but idk waiting for all mighty masterg's reply
 0
PM Link
Maybe with chat muted so 10+ people dont meet up
 0
PM Link
UHC?
 0
PM Link
Why 276?
 0
PM Link
Yes @Archybot it is a UHC gamemode from reddit. And @MasterGberry it was just an example I think. He just means an even number.
 0
PM Link
@Archybot yes for uhc
@Zebra_Official you are exactly right
@MasterGberry FFA badlion games usually have 275 people but to make it a fair game because its half vs half i made it even it can be any even number
 0
PM Link
@MasterGberry @Archybot you can do any even number but I recommend doing a solo scatter, because if not it would be a clusterfuck at the spawn, also it is basically big teams, like war in arena pvp, but in actual UHC.
 0
PM Link
This is sooo fun, I've played quite a few of these on reddit and twitter. Tbh it should be an event not a UHC gamemode though
 0
PM Link
Stop tagging the owners constantly
 0
PM Link
Ok @freekkiller

no but actually this would be awesome
 0
PM Link
Let me make everything less confuseing here we go.

So i was thinking maybe Badlion could host a Red vs Blue game in UHC but not too often though. If you dont know what Red vs Blue is its a reddit scenario and here is a description:

Your text to link here...


The teams would have to be even.

The only problems i can find is the following

that if one color/team wins should it be counted in the stats? ( my answer is to progress to an FFA and let the last person in the winning team/color have a win counted in the stats) (maybe have a 1 minute grace period after the team wins so it isnt a total betrayl warfare and madness)

Also should team killing be allowed? (Maybe let the host decide is my answer)

Also i have another suggestion:
Red vs Blue vs Green?
Or Red vs Blue vs Green vs Yellow?

Thanks sorry i made things confusing
xFrozti (also can i have credit before every game if you do the Red vs Blue vs Green or the Red vs Blue vs Green vs Yellow?

Thank you

#
@Hivlik
@Archybot
@MasterGberry
 0
PM Link

xFrozti wrote

Let me make everything less confuseing here we go.

So i was thinking maybe Badlion could host a Red vs Blue game in UHC but not too often though. If you dont know what Red vs Blue is its a reddit scenario and here is a description:

Your text to link here...


The teams would have to be even.

The only problems i can find is the following

that if one color/team wins should it be counted in the stats? ( my answer is to progress to an FFA and let the last person in the winning team/color have a win counted in the stats) (maybe have a 1 minute grace period after the team wins so it isnt a total betrayl warfare and madness)

Also should team killing be allowed? (Maybe let the host decide is my answer)

Also i have another suggestion:
Red vs Blue vs Green?
Or Red vs Blue vs Green vs Yellow?

Thanks sorry i made things confusing
xFrozti (also can i have credit before every game if you do the Red vs Blue vs Green or the Red vs Blue vs Green vs Yellow?

Thank you

#
@Hivlik
@Archybot
@MasterGberry

I understand, but my solution is all who are alive when a team wins should be counted in the stats, and since you didn't create the scenario I doubt you'd get credit sorry
 0
PM Link
Thats cool! Although I think 276 is a bit too much. I think 200 would be a good number. 100v100 seems cool. And it doesn't have to be UHC too, it can also be any other ladder.
 0
PM Link
So basically what you're suggesting is a Team Deathmatch?
 0
PM Link

freekkiller wrote

So basically what you're suggesting is a Team Deathmatch?

Yes, a two team deathmatch
 0
PM Link