Posted on 05 August 2015 - 03:25 AM
+1 (But not 1000 +, I'd say 600)Posted on 05 August 2015 - 08:47 AM
InsanePace wrote
600 for archive 1000p in the future great.
Posted on 06 August 2015 - 08:57 PM
500 views suport me and comment!!Posted on 07 August 2015 - 03:00 AM
Everyone would be sweating that game lmao xDDPosted on 07 August 2015 - 12:10 PM
10 HOURS?!?!!? DO YOU HAVE A LIFE?!?Posted on 08 August 2015 - 02:40 AM
Sounds cool except for the lag part >.<Posted on 08 August 2015 - 08:01 PM
TehQuilla wrote
Its possible but unprobable 0.5% possiblites of this.
a 24h MATCH 0.0001%
a 3 days match 0.00000000000001%
Posted on 09 August 2015 - 06:25 AM
Wouldn't 1,000 players be to much to moderate? There will be at least 100 bans due to all the rule breakers.Posted on 09 August 2015 - 12:21 PM
YourLame wrote
20-30 bans not 100 bans .
Posted on 09 August 2015 - 12:52 PM
How can you be sure 20-30 bans not 100.Posted on 09 August 2015 - 09:55 PM
Teracerus wrote
Estimate number.
Posted on 10 August 2015 - 11:31 PM
-1Posted on 11 August 2015 - 09:12 PM
Imo, 1000 player games would be like this:10k by 10k maps.
Normal rules.
ALLWAYS a team of 3 or more so players would be less spread out and lag the server even more. Give others more space.
45min Border shrink
45-8k
50-6k
55-4k
60-3k
65-2500
70-2k
75-1500
80-1k
85-500
90-100
110-50
115-10 (is that even a thing?)
Posted on 11 August 2015 - 10:43 PM
DaPortuguezBqcon wrote
10k by 10k maps.
Normal rules.
ALLWAYS a team of 3 or more so players would be less spread out and lag the server even more. Give others more space.
45min Border shrink
45-8k
50-6k
55-4k
60-3k
65-2500
70-2k
75-1500
80-1k
85-500
90-100
110-50
115-10 (is that even a thing?)
I think this bordee skink
60 min 9k
70min 8.5k
80min 8k
100min 7k
120min 6k
140min 3k
160min 1.5k
180mkn 750
200min 500
220min 250 forever
5hours still 250
Map size
10k x 10k = 16 times bigger than now(2.5k)
Posted on 12 August 2015 - 09:47 PM
this idea sounds like something a 5 year old would writePosted on 13 August 2015 - 02:48 AM