Posted on 09 August 2015 - 03:52 PM
Every now and then, we post on forums. We sometimes post the most worthless stuff, like an 'lol' or a 'wkwkwk.' Sometimes it can even be an insightful essay that can influence others. Such is the nature of the forum post; it can have any kind of content, any kind of message, any kind of contribution to the topic at hand. But no matter the nature of the post, it is certain to have a poster. Acknowledge the information on the left-hand side of the post. You'll see a name, a group and possibly some positions. However, we don't care about any of that. None of it pertains to the post at hand, and nothing there is truly of interest besides one single thing. That particular thing I'm referring to is the post count. Every time you post, the number goes up. Every now and then, a certain phenomenon occurs. The last few digits of the post are identical. The exact same. There is only a mere 10% chance of this happening every time a post is created. But let's think beyond that. Imagine getting three in a row – no, four in a row. Now, that's something truly rare. In this post, I managed to bend the will of fate and manipulated the resulting post number. I created a post that gave me a post number of 7777. That's four sevens, beautifully lined up. You see one seven, then another, then another, and then yet another. This is truly a special number, and I shall cherish the limited amount of time I have with it.Here's your daily reminder to check 'em.
Posted on 09 August 2015 - 03:56 PM
This is the post that marks my being #1 since the reset in March '14.@pal
Acknowledge my winning of this long-winded war.
Posted on 09 August 2015 - 04:50 PM
Mr_Bloxley wrote
You got like a free 2k because my internet barely worked for 3 weeks
pssh
Posted on 09 August 2015 - 05:01 PM
brb passing @MasterGberry today or tomorrowPosted on 09 August 2015 - 08:09 PM
Maybe SINCE the reset pal, but not in all.
But think about this, pal;
Is it really a war if there's only one individual directly involved with dedication? Only one who perceives, what is a simple almost meaningless number to most, as a challenge to war? The only one who has made the mistake of believing that others he suspects to be a definite participant in this one-sided, gauged war?
By definition, a war requires more than a single participant. Call it a race, if you will. But even a race holds no sense of accomplishment if there are no competitors– which raises the question… is it even race?
Posted on 09 August 2015 - 10:24 PM
Varicks wrote

But think about this, pal;
Is it really a war if there's only one individual directly involved with dedication? Only one who perceives, what is a simple almost meaningless number to most, as a challenge to war? The only one who has made the mistake of believing that others he suspects to be a definite participant in this one-sided, gauged war?
By definition, a war requires more than a single participant. Call it a race, if you will. But even a race holds no sense of accomplishment if there are no competitors– which raises the question… is it even race?
what the fuck is wrong with you people
Posted on 10 August 2015 - 02:03 AM
PersonKool wrote
look I made a post
Look I made a quote
Posted on 10 August 2015 - 03:03 AM
Little known fact that they create clans and have a spam bot posting.Posted on 10 August 2015 - 03:51 AM
redpandaarcher wrote
PersonKool wrote...
Look I made a quote
Look i made a quote of your quote
Posted on 10 August 2015 - 07:50 AM
Pretcorp2 wrote
redpandaarcher wrote...
Look i made a quote of your quote
Posted on 10 August 2015 - 09:30 AM
Tarqeted wrote
Pretcorp2 wrote...
so we're quote spamming now?
Posted on 10 August 2015 - 11:37 AM
Varicks wrote
By definition, a war requires more than a single participant. Call it a race, if you will. But even a race holds no sense of accomplishment if there are no competitors– which raises the question… is it even race?
Remember that consciousness in the participation of war is not necessary for the partaking of a war. The competition is perfectly real; ironically, it is simply that the one formerly first in the running was oblivious to it.
Posted on 10 August 2015 - 03:28 PM
Morsinius wrote
Remember that consciousness in the participation of war is not necessary for the partaking of a war. The competition is perfectly real; ironically, it is simply that the one formerly first in the running was oblivious to it.
A competition is not that if only one individual assumes a side.
Wars, by nature, are official. Although preparation is in order, there is not an official war until one declares it a war, and then the war is to begin.
Because of this, the war begun yesterday. This is effectively a miniscule conflict, not approaching the scale of a war by any means at any convenience..
Posted on 10 August 2015 - 04:32 PM
Varicks wrote
Wars, by nature, are official. Although preparation is in order, there is not an official war until one declares it a war, and then the war is to begin.
Because of this, the war begun yesterday. This is effectively a miniscule conflict, not approaching the scale of a war by any means at any convenience..
[23/04/15 7:31:15] varicks: ?
[23/04/15 7:46:09] morsinius: the forum post war
[23/04/15 7:46:35] morsinius: surpassed burntcactus and masterggberry on the same day
[23/04/15 7:56:49] varicks: i didn't realize it was a war
[23/04/15 8:13:30] morsinius: it is now.
2 late
Posted on 10 August 2015 - 04:46 PM
Morsinius wrote
Varicks wrote...
[23/04/15 7:31:15] varicks: ?
[23/04/15 7:46:09] morsinius: the forum post war
[23/04/15 7:46:35] morsinius: surpassed burntcactus and masterggberry on the same day
[23/04/15 7:56:49] varicks: i didn't realize it was a war
[23/04/15 8:13:30] morsinius: it is now.
2 late