Posted on 12 October 2015 - 12:17 AM
demcmd wrote
It's not even the real name of the check… Also the administration will not reveal information because of bypasses.
Posted on 12 October 2015 - 12:32 AM
praise gcheatflawless, 100% accuracy
does not ban people randomly
praise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheatpraise gcheat
Posted on 12 October 2015 - 08:14 AM
GCHEAT IS LOVE GCHEAT IS LIFE GCHEAT IS NEW BAEPosted on 12 October 2015 - 12:52 PM
ItsTene wrote
So basically they're not even going to say what Check #23 is for no reason whatsoever? Kind of dumb, in my opinion at least. They should at least inform us what it's instead of saying it's legit and leaving it at that.
Posted on 12 October 2015 - 01:54 PM
demcmd wrote
I hope you realize that by revealing such info, hack developers can find ways to bypass the check. The devs are obviously not going to be happy about creating a new check to catch whoever is bypassing check #23. Would you rather be informed and have closet hackers running around freely on the server? Knowledge for those who don't need it does not have to be given; it's up to you whether to believe it or not. Keeping this knowledge from the public is for your own good, and not dumb by any means. Check #23 is something that's been tested thoroughly, and I'd put my faith in the admins that this is a check that only a hacked client can set off consistently.
Posted on 12 October 2015 - 03:57 PM
demcmd wrote
ItsTene wrote...
So basically they're not even going to say what Check #23 is for no reason whatsoever? Kind of dumb, in my opinion at least. They should at least inform us what it's instead of saying it's legit and leaving it at that.
@demmysmileface
See above post
The actual checks would say (player) is using (hack here) (type here) vl (violation level)
Posted on 12 October 2015 - 07:45 PM
sariya wrote
Thanks for writing a full rant for one question. I'm pretty sure though that saying one specific thing about one specific part of the GCheat you have isn't going to do much. Does Check #23 detect Aimbot? AutoClicker? Does it thouroughly go through the user's files to see if they have any installed clients? I don't know, but someone does. The unfortunate part is that nobody here is either right or wrong because nobody except the people inside the development staff team knows what it is. There's no point in causing forest fires over something five out of thousands of people know about. Counter me if you'd like, or you could PM me what it means (even though I doubt you'd do that because of trust issues), or you and the entire Badlion community can continue to spit out the only words they know how to use to defend something they aren't informed of.
Posted on 12 October 2015 - 08:01 PM
demcmd wrote
sariya wrote...
Thanks for writing a full rant for one question. I'm pretty sure though that saying one specific thing about one specific part of the GCheat you have isn't going to do much. Does Check #23 detect Aimbot? AutoClicker? Does it thouroughly go through the user's files to see if they have any installed clients? I don't know, but someone does. The unfortunate part is that nobody here is either right or wrong because nobody except the people inside the development staff team knows what it is. There's no point in causing forest fires over something five out of thousands of people know about. Counter me if you'd like, or you could PM me what it means (even though I doubt you'd do that because of trust issues), or you and the entire Badlion community can continue to spit out the only words they know how to use to defend something they aren't informed of.
Yes it is. Because if AsianWiz knows how he was banned, he could admit and then help hack creators theoretically.
GCheat detects triggerbot, autoclicker, and mostly all hacks that aren't client sided.
Posted on 12 October 2015 - 08:42 PM
What the fuck is this twit bird uhc shit and who the hell is AsianwizPosted on 12 October 2015 - 09:09 PM
ItsTene wrote
I'm officially done with this thread. That's possibly the dumbest thing I've heard since this situation arose.
EDIT: By the way, thanks to the staff member who replied to me who kind of made me start believing this whole situation is an overreaction more than a punishment.
Posted on 12 October 2015 - 09:59 PM
demcmd wrote
ItsTene wrote...
I'm officially done with this thread. That's possibly the dumbest thing I've heard since this situation arose.
EDIT: By the way, thanks to the staff member who replied to me who kind of made me start believing this whole situation is an overreaction more than a punishment.
How is this dumb? He has an hacked client that got detected by our network. It's possible he got someone to code it for him or he just bought one. If he knows how his client got detected, how can you say he's totally not going to make an updated version to bypass it?
Posted on 12 October 2015 - 10:18 PM
Ginie1 wrote
demcmd wrote...
How is this dumb? He has an hacked client that got detected by our network. It's possible he got someone to code it for him or he just bought one. If he knows how his client got detected, how can you say he's totally not going to make an updated version to bypass it?
@demmysmileface
Posted on 12 October 2015 - 10:20 PM
demcmd wrote
sariya wrote...
Thanks for writing a full rant for one question.
TIL that constructive criticism is considered a rant. We're not going to release any information regarding GCheat. If you get banned for "Unfair Advantage", then you know what you did. It doesn't matter if you can't figure out if it was your no-knockback that caused you to get banned or your triggerbot, nor would I care.
Posted on 12 October 2015 - 10:26 PM
demcmd wrote
sariya wrote...
Thanks for writing a full rant for one question. I'm pretty sure though that saying one specific thing about one specific part of the GCheat you have isn't going to do much. Does Check #23 detect Aimbot? AutoClicker? Does it thouroughly go through the user's files to see if they have any installed clients? I don't know, but someone does. The unfortunate part is that nobody here is either right or wrong because nobody except the people inside the development staff team knows what it is. There's no point in causing forest fires over something five out of thousands of people know about. Counter me if you'd like, or you could PM me what it means (even though I doubt you'd do that because of trust issues), or you and the entire Badlion community can continue to spit out the only words they know how to use to defend something they aren't informed of.
Thanks for writing a full rant for one conversation (is your attention span that small that you consider a paragraph trying to give a thorough answer a rant?).
Posted on 12 October 2015 - 10:50 PM
this entire thing is absolutely horrendous, this game was never meant to have drama. Asian says he wasn't hacking, Gberry says he was. Both sides are literally throwing out assertions and accusation with no evidence in the slightest. I guarantee that 90% of the people on both sides have no clue how anti-cheats or ghost clients work.fucking hell man, stuff like this that makes me want to quit this game
edit: i dont actually mean the devs are throwing out accusations, just the average playerbase with no actual knowledge of gcheat