Join Date: 20 May 2015

Posts: 1141

Posted on 15 January 2016 - 06:31 AM

1. SSB
2. Any Super Mario Galaxy games

PM Link

SkellyBot Members

Join Date: 17 December 2014

Posts: 1455

Posted on 15 January 2016 - 10:44 AM

Super Mario Sunshine (isn't Wii game but I played it on Wii since I didn't have gamecube). It was so fucking fun yiugrtaoyruorkjhbmn

PM Link

Syzaro Members

Join Date: 29 December 2015

Posts: 445

Posted on 15 January 2016 - 12:45 PM

1. MARIO KART
2. WII SPORTS CLASSIC
3. MARIO 2 PLAYER OMG

PM Link

stheegala Premium

Positions:

- Retired Staff

Join Date: 10 June 2014

Posts: 1874

Posted on 15 January 2016 - 03:41 PM

DK Country Returns
Super Mario Galaxy TWO
Twilight Princess

PM Link

serendipidU Members

Join Date: 28 June 2014

Posts: 2243

Posted on 15 January 2016 - 05:19 PM

JUST DANCE
i never really played any actual games on mine, mostly wii sports

PM Link

xKniqht Members

Join Date: 13 July 2014

Posts: 2025

Posted on 15 January 2016 - 05:36 PM

I love how 2 things about this thread
1. Nobody being an asshole and saying "Ha I have a WiiU Scrubs"
2. It gives me so many notifications
3. I get to see a bunch of new games that people like

PM Link

lmBlitz Members

Join Date: 27 May 2015

Posts: 1792

Posted on 15 January 2016 - 07:01 PM

mario kart WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

PM Link

JacobArnold Premium

Positions:

- Retired Staff

Join Date: 06 October 2013

Posts: 2025

Last edited on 16 January 2016 - 05:34 AM by JacobArnold

xKniqht wrote

JacobArnold wrote...

Please explain how "better" gameplay can compensate for shitty graphics

"1. brawl has slipping; don't need to explain this one
Tier list and character matchups having much greater impact. Where in melee you could beat an opponent even with a lower tiered character because characters were more balanced throughout, the priority numbers on brawl characters are far more broken, and some characters are clearly just better than the other (pikachu's down smash absorbs ganon's warlock punch, meta-knight and snake being SSS tier). There are also broken matchups in the game from elements such as marth's infinite grab against ness/lucas
Easy execution of skills and slower gameplay in brawl - because players need to react to things and execute combos faster, it takes more skill, and fighting game is all about display of good skill. This is why so many starcraft 1 players hate on starcraft 2, and why dota players hate lol - it's not because they hate change or that they're used to the original, it's because they dumb down the game play so lot of high level plays that would require tons of skill or practice become accessible to low level players, thereby reducing the difference between skilled and unskilled players. For example, in melee even a player that was little bit better than me could beat me consistently, while I could destroy anyone who were worse than me, while in brawl it seems like I have a fair chance of beating opponents that have been playing brawl for much longer just by using a high-tiered character and learning some simple tricks like snakedash
The skill ceiling - To me the most important thing in a competitive game is its skill ceiling and that mastering the game is an extremely high bar or nonexistent.
-> tl:dr - tier list/matchups matter too much, and melee has far higher skill ceiling. I don't think brawl is a bad game, and it would have been a great game had it been its own game, but because it's a sequel it unfortunately gets compared to melee which is probably one of the greatest fighting games of all time."

PM Link

xKniqht Members

Join Date: 13 July 2014

Posts: 2025

Posted on 16 January 2016 - 08:33 AM

JacobArnold wrote

xKniqht wrote...

"1. brawl has slipping; don't need to explain this one
Tier list and character matchups having much greater impact. Where in melee you could beat an opponent even with a lower tiered character because characters were more balanced throughout, the priority numbers on brawl characters are far more broken, and some characters are clearly just better than the other (pikachu's down smash absorbs ganon's warlock punch, meta-knight and snake being SSS tier). There are also broken matchups in the game from elements such as marth's infinite grab against ness/lucas
Easy execution of skills and slower gameplay in brawl - because players need to react to things and execute combos faster, it takes more skill, and fighting game is all about display of good skill. This is why so many starcraft 1 players hate on starcraft 2, and why dota players hate lol - it's not because they hate change or that they're used to the original, it's because they dumb down the game play so lot of high level plays that would require tons of skill or practice become accessible to low level players, thereby reducing the difference between skilled and unskilled players. For example, in melee even a player that was little bit better than me could beat me consistently, while I could destroy anyone who were worse than me, while in brawl it seems like I have a fair chance of beating opponents that have been playing brawl for much longer just by using a high-tiered character and learning some simple tricks like snakedash
The skill ceiling - To me the most important thing in a competitive game is its skill ceiling and that mastering the game is an extremely high bar or nonexistent.
-> tl:dr - tier list/matchups matter too much, and melee has far higher skill ceiling. I don't think brawl is a bad game, and it would have been a great game had it been its own game, but because it's a sequel it unfortunately gets compared to melee which is probably one of the greatest fighting games of all time."

Do you have both games?

PM Link

JacobArnold Premium

Positions:

- Retired Staff

Join Date: 06 October 2013

Posts: 2025

Posted on 16 January 2016 - 12:36 PM

xKniqht wrote

JacobArnold wrote...

xKniqht wrote...

"1. brawl has slipping; don't need to explain this one
Tier list and character matchups having much greater impact. Where in melee you could beat an opponent even with a lower tiered character because characters were more balanced throughout, the priority numbers on brawl characters are far more broken, and some characters are clearly just better than the other (pikachu's down smash absorbs ganon's warlock punch, meta-knight and snake being SSS tier). There are also broken matchups in the game from elements such as marth's infinite grab against ness/lucas
Easy execution of skills and slower gameplay in brawl - because players need to react to things and execute combos faster, it takes more skill, and fighting game is all about display of good skill. This is why so many starcraft 1 players hate on starcraft 2, and why dota players hate lol - it's not because they hate change or that they're used to the original, it's because they dumb down the game play so lot of high level plays that would require tons of skill or practice become accessible to low level players, thereby reducing the difference between skilled and unskilled players. For example, in melee even a player that was little bit better than me could beat me consistently, while I could destroy anyone who were worse than me, while in brawl it seems like I have a fair chance of beating opponents that have been playing brawl for much longer just by using a high-tiered character and learning some simple tricks like snakedash
The skill ceiling - To me the most important thing in a competitive game is its skill ceiling and that mastering the game is an extremely high bar or nonexistent.
-> tl:dr - tier list/matchups matter too much, and melee has far higher skill ceiling. I don't think brawl is a bad game, and it would have been a great game had it been its own game, but because it's a sequel it unfortunately gets compared to melee which is probably one of the greatest fighting games of all time."

Do you have both games?

yes I own all of the smash bros games and play all of them competitively.

PM Link

ressentiment Members

Join Date: 15 March 2015

Posts: 18

Last edited on 16 January 2016 - 08:57 PM by ressentiment

JacobArnold wrote

xKniqht wrote...

JacobArnold wrote...

xKniqht wrote...

"1. brawl has slipping; don't need to explain this one
Tier list and character matchups having much greater impact. Where in melee you could beat an opponent even with a lower tiered character because characters were more balanced throughout, the priority numbers on brawl characters are far more broken, and some characters are clearly just better than the other (pikachu's down smash absorbs ganon's warlock punch, meta-knight and snake being SSS tier). There are also broken matchups in the game from elements such as marth's infinite grab against ness/lucas
Easy execution of skills and slower gameplay in brawl - because players need to react to things and execute combos faster, it takes more skill, and fighting game is all about display of good skill. This is why so many starcraft 1 players hate on starcraft 2, and why dota players hate lol - it's not because they hate change or that they're used to the original, it's because they dumb down the game play so lot of high level plays that would require tons of skill or practice become accessible to low level players, thereby reducing the difference between skilled and unskilled players. For example, in melee even a player that was little bit better than me could beat me consistently, while I could destroy anyone who were worse than me, while in brawl it seems like I have a fair chance of beating opponents that have been playing brawl for much longer just by using a high-tiered character and learning some simple tricks like snakedash
The skill ceiling - To me the most important thing in a competitive game is its skill ceiling and that mastering the game is an extremely high bar or nonexistent.
-> tl:dr - tier list/matchups matter too much, and melee has far higher skill ceiling. I don't think brawl is a bad game, and it would have been a great game had it been its own game, but because it's a sequel it unfortunately gets compared to melee which is probably one of the greatest fighting games of all time."

Do you have both games?

yes I own all of the smash bros games and play all of them competitively.

okay, let's just end this argument once and for all
https://smash.gg/tournament/genesis-3/brackets
this is a large national smash bros tournament going on right now
there is 1764 players registered in singles bracket and 397 teams in doubles for melee
there is 1096 players for singles and 272 teams in doubles in the wii u version
there is 238 players and 47 teams in the 64 version
brawl isn't even at the event
gg.
edit: please, snake is middle a-tier at best

PM Link

JacobArnold Premium

Positions:

- Retired Staff

Join Date: 06 October 2013

Posts: 2025

Posted on 16 January 2016 - 08:28 PM

MemesEndLives wrote

JacobArnold wrote...

xKniqht wrote...

JacobArnold wrote...

xKniqht wrote...

"1. brawl has slipping; don't need to explain this one
Tier list and character matchups having much greater impact. Where in melee you could beat an opponent even with a lower tiered character because characters were more balanced throughout, the priority numbers on brawl characters are far more broken, and some characters are clearly just better than the other (pikachu's down smash absorbs ganon's warlock punch, meta-knight and snake being SSS tier). There are also broken matchups in the game from elements such as marth's infinite grab against ness/lucas
Easy execution of skills and slower gameplay in brawl - because players need to react to things and execute combos faster, it takes more skill, and fighting game is all about display of good skill. This is why so many starcraft 1 players hate on starcraft 2, and why dota players hate lol - it's not because they hate change or that they're used to the original, it's because they dumb down the game play so lot of high level plays that would require tons of skill or practice become accessible to low level players, thereby reducing the difference between skilled and unskilled players. For example, in melee even a player that was little bit better than me could beat me consistently, while I could destroy anyone who were worse than me, while in brawl it seems like I have a fair chance of beating opponents that have been playing brawl for much longer just by using a high-tiered character and learning some simple tricks like snakedash
The skill ceiling - To me the most important thing in a competitive game is its skill ceiling and that mastering the game is an extremely high bar or nonexistent.
-> tl:dr - tier list/matchups matter too much, and melee has far higher skill ceiling. I don't think brawl is a bad game, and it would have been a great game had it been its own game, but because it's a sequel it unfortunately gets compared to melee which is probably one of the greatest fighting games of all time."

Do you have both games?

yes I own all of the smash bros games and play all of them competitively.

okay, let's just end this argument once and for all
https://smash.gg/tournament/genesis-3/brackets
this is a large national smash bros tournament going on right now
there is 1764 players registered in singles bracket and 397 teams in doubles for melee
there is 1096 players for singles and 272 teams in doubles in the wii u version
there is 238 players and 47 teams in the 64 version
brawl isn't even at the event
gg.

^

PM Link

JacobArnold Premium

Positions:

- Retired Staff

Join Date: 06 October 2013

Posts: 2025

Posted on 16 January 2016 - 09:24 PM

MemesEndLives wrote

JacobArnold wrote...

xKniqht wrote...

JacobArnold wrote...

xKniqht wrote...

"1. brawl has slipping; don't need to explain this one
Tier list and character matchups having much greater impact. Where in melee you could beat an opponent even with a lower tiered character because characters were more balanced throughout, the priority numbers on brawl characters are far more broken, and some characters are clearly just better than the other (pikachu's down smash absorbs ganon's warlock punch, meta-knight and snake being SSS tier). There are also broken matchups in the game from elements such as marth's infinite grab against ness/lucas
Easy execution of skills and slower gameplay in brawl - because players need to react to things and execute combos faster, it takes more skill, and fighting game is all about display of good skill. This is why so many starcraft 1 players hate on starcraft 2, and why dota players hate lol - it's not because they hate change or that they're used to the original, it's because they dumb down the game play so lot of high level plays that would require tons of skill or practice become accessible to low level players, thereby reducing the difference between skilled and unskilled players. For example, in melee even a player that was little bit better than me could beat me consistently, while I could destroy anyone who were worse than me, while in brawl it seems like I have a fair chance of beating opponents that have been playing brawl for much longer just by using a high-tiered character and learning some simple tricks like snakedash
The skill ceiling - To me the most important thing in a competitive game is its skill ceiling and that mastering the game is an extremely high bar or nonexistent.
-> tl:dr - tier list/matchups matter too much, and melee has far higher skill ceiling. I don't think brawl is a bad game, and it would have been a great game had it been its own game, but because it's a sequel it unfortunately gets compared to melee which is probably one of the greatest fighting games of all time."

Do you have both games?

yes I own all of the smash bros games and play all of them competitively.

okay, let's just end this argument once and for all
https://smash.gg/tournament/genesis-3/brackets
this is a large national smash bros tournament going on right now
there is 1764 players registered in singles bracket and 397 teams in doubles for melee
there is 1096 players for singles and 272 teams in doubles in the wii u version
there is 238 players and 47 teams in the 64 version
brawl isn't even at the event
gg.
edit: please, snake is middle a-tier at best

i was arguing for melee btw, not sure if you got that.

PM Link

ressentiment Members

Join Date: 15 March 2015

Posts: 18

Posted on 16 January 2016 - 09:44 PM

JacobArnold wrote

MemesEndLives wrote...

JacobArnold wrote...

xKniqht wrote...

JacobArnold wrote...

xKniqht wrote...

"1. brawl has slipping; don't need to explain this one
Tier list and character matchups having much greater impact. Where in melee you could beat an opponent even with a lower tiered character because characters were more balanced throughout, the priority numbers on brawl characters are far more broken, and some characters are clearly just better than the other (pikachu's down smash absorbs ganon's warlock punch, meta-knight and snake being SSS tier). There are also broken matchups in the game from elements such as marth's infinite grab against ness/lucas
Easy execution of skills and slower gameplay in brawl - because players need to react to things and execute combos faster, it takes more skill, and fighting game is all about display of good skill. This is why so many starcraft 1 players hate on starcraft 2, and why dota players hate lol - it's not because they hate change or that they're used to the original, it's because they dumb down the game play so lot of high level plays that would require tons of skill or practice become accessible to low level players, thereby reducing the difference between skilled and unskilled players. For example, in melee even a player that was little bit better than me could beat me consistently, while I could destroy anyone who were worse than me, while in brawl it seems like I have a fair chance of beating opponents that have been playing brawl for much longer just by using a high-tiered character and learning some simple tricks like snakedash
The skill ceiling - To me the most important thing in a competitive game is its skill ceiling and that mastering the game is an extremely high bar or nonexistent.
-> tl:dr - tier list/matchups matter too much, and melee has far higher skill ceiling. I don't think brawl is a bad game, and it would have been a great game had it been its own game, but because it's a sequel it unfortunately gets compared to melee which is probably one of the greatest fighting games of all time."

Do you have both games?

yes I own all of the smash bros games and play all of them competitively.

okay, let's just end this argument once and for all
https://smash.gg/tournament/genesis-3/brackets
this is a large national smash bros tournament going on right now
there is 1764 players registered in singles bracket and 397 teams in doubles for melee
there is 1096 players for singles and 272 teams in doubles in the wii u version
there is 238 players and 47 teams in the 64 version
brawl isn't even at the event
gg.
edit: please, snake is middle a-tier at best

i was arguing for melee btw, not sure if you got that.

ik, i was just making a little joke, considering all of the tier lists for brawl go 1. MK 2. ICs 3. Olimar and snake is like upper b tier

PM Link