Subscribe
New Kit suggestion
Posted on 29 January 2016 - 01:55 AM
OnRestrictionn wrote
BakaBot wrote...
ik but he thinks it's because of his thread, ironbuild had nothing to do with him whatsoever
Please clarify things before jumping to conclusions. nowhere did I claim they added ironbuild because of this post. I merely stated its funny how some of you guys -1'd something and a almost identical idea was implemented. Based off of time they were most likely already working on production of the ironbuild kit before I made this post. It wasn't a bad Idea clearly, the forums just weren't the right audience apparently.
Posted on 29 January 2016 - 09:54 AM
Natural44 wrote
OnRestrictionn wrote...
Please clarify things before jumping to conclusions. nowhere did I claim they added ironbuild because of this post. I merely stated its funny how some of you guys -1'd something and a almost identical idea was implemented. Based off of time they were most likely already working on production of the ironbuild kit before I made this post. It wasn't a bad Idea clearly, the forums just weren't the right audience apparently.
"I love how there were so many -1's and they ended up adding this kit. :D"
Ahh so I'm the one jumping to conclusions when you said this? Most of what you said doesn't really tie in with the actually iron build kit, they did not add 'this' kit, ironbuild was actually very different from your idea. And also, wtf is "the forums weren't the right audience" supposed to mean? That's where everyone on the server goes to look at suggestions, if the forums "weren't the right audience" then what the fuck is? lmao
Posted on 29 January 2016 - 10:05 AM
OnRestrictionn wrote
Natural44 wrote...
"I love how there were so many -1's and they ended up adding this kit. :D"
Ahh so I'm the one jumping to conclusions when you said this? Most of what you said doesn't really tie in with the actually iron build kit, they did not add 'this' kit, ironbuild was actually very different from your idea. And also, wtf is "the forums weren't the right audience" supposed to mean? That's where everyone on the server goes to look at suggestions, if the forums "weren't the right audience" then what the fuck is? lmao
chill fam
Posted on 29 January 2016 - 10:30 AM
We dont need a second build uhcPosted on 29 January 2016 - 06:05 PM
OnRestrictionn wrote
Natural44 wrote...
"I love how there were so many -1's and they ended up adding this kit. :D"
Ahh so I'm the one jumping to conclusions when you said this? Most of what you said doesn't really tie in with the actually iron build kit, they did not add 'this' kit, ironbuild was actually very different from your idea. And also, wtf is "the forums weren't the right audience" supposed to mean? That's where everyone on the server goes to look at suggestions, if the forums "weren't the right audience" then what the fuck is? lmao
First lol to how many quotes there are.
Everyone in my friend group and all of the people from my stream thought it was a great idea. Hence the forumns being a different audience.
Next how is the UHC Kit with blocks and tools and less healing not close to the iron build kit? Pretty sure that's practically identical except for a piece of diamond armor and a few numbers with items and enchant tiers.
Lastly I apologize for not looking back and I see how my statement about the -1's could have been misleading. I am going to drop the argument at hand as it is an unnessecary argument and both of our time could be put into better use.
Posted on 06 February 2016 - 02:50 PM
+1