Posted on 27 January 2016 - 12:56 AM
Hackers are the most annoying thing, right? I was thinking that if you get drained elo by them should get the elo back from when the hacker was killing them (if they were generating GCheat logs because you may have died to them while they werent hacking.) Also, I think that if you send in the evidence and they get banned, you should get the elo back that you lost when they kiled you. Please +1Posted on 27 January 2016 - 02:51 AM
It would be to much to give all players that lost woo to hackers elo's back. The staff would never be finished.Best thing to do is report them and get them banned.
Last edited on 27 January 2016 - 02:54 AM by torace
@Aymbaut you know what to do herePosted on 27 January 2016 - 08:23 AM
So Player 1 and Player 2 (or just Player 1's alt) have a great ideaPlayer 2 drops Player 1 from 1500 to 1100
Then Player 1 grinds all the way up to 2000
Player 2 then gets banned, and now Player 1 has 2400 elo
Unless you adjust for inflation, it wouldn't work
Posted on 27 January 2016 - 11:28 PM
TheKillsMagnetMC wrote
Posted on 27 January 2016 - 11:54 PM
dwipeout wrote
TheKillsMagnetMC wrote...
lmao what? I got banned for GCheat once I'm pretty sure everyone has hacked at one point but I haven't hacked ever since then. and when did i try to get you banned lol
Posted on 27 January 2016 - 11:59 PM
Aymbaut wrote
Player 2 drops Player 1 from 1500 to 1100
Then Player 1 grinds all the way up to 2000
Player 2 then gets banned, and now Player 1 has 2400 elo
Unless you adjust for inflation, it wouldn't work
Best argument I've heard against this thus far.
Posted on 28 January 2016 - 12:19 AM
Ya I guess that makes sense but it should be based on how many matches u lost, not the elo u lost now that i think about itPosted on 28 January 2016 - 12:19 AM
ItsTene wrote
Aymbaut wrote...
Best argument I've heard against this thus far.
Even if you adjust for inflation, it's still unfair. You're still providing a new way for players to exploit the system and elo boost.
Hackers are part of the game, and I don't think this system could ever do more good than harm.
Posted on 28 January 2016 - 12:37 AM
that is very truePosted on 28 January 2016 - 06:18 PM
If the hacker gets banned, the last person he fought should get the elo is my reasoningPosted on 28 January 2016 - 08:06 PM
TheKillsMagnetMC wrote
dwipeout wrote...
lmao what? I got banned for GCheat once I'm pretty sure everyone has hacked at one point but I haven't hacked ever since then. and when did i try to get you banned lol
Posted on 28 January 2016 - 08:55 PM
TheKillsMagnetMC wrote
dwipeout wrote...
lmao what? I got banned for GCheat once I'm pretty sure everyone has hacked at one point but I haven't hacked ever since then. and when did i try to get you banned lol
"everyone has hacked at some point"
Lmao dumbest thing I've ever heard on the forums, not everyone is a dick.
Posted on 29 January 2016 - 12:58 AM
Aymbaut wrote
Player 2 drops Player 1 from 1500 to 1100
Then Player 1 grinds all the way up to 2000
Player 2 then gets banned, and now Player 1 has 2400 elo
Unless you adjust for inflation, it wouldn't work