Posted on 03 February 2016 - 06:09 PM
The Reasoning is because how does a 1853 drain me 23 elo when im like 1875 i think we need a revamped elo system next season such as if you gg10 em 20 elo g 5 them 10 elo gg 4 0,5 4 2 eloPosted on 03 February 2016 - 06:30 PM
What?Posted on 03 February 2016 - 06:30 PM
-100000000000000000000Posted on 03 February 2016 - 06:36 PM
Instructions unclear, got dick stuck in toaster-1
Last edited on 03 February 2016 - 06:44 PM by Gipton
SergeantJackson wrote
Then it wouldn't be an Elo system… It'd simply be a different point system as Elo is a specific points system used in things like Chess, Scrabble etc.
An 1853 Elo player doesn't drain you 23 elo when you're 1875, if they beat you it's likely around 17 elo you'd lose. Just as if you beat them you'd gain about 15 Elo.
I really do not understand why people complain about the Elo system because even if it was changed you'd still lose to this guy and you'd still be as good/bad as you are now, you wouldn't look any better. You'd still have the same score in comparison to the people better/worse than you, your ranking wouldn't change.
Posted on 03 February 2016 - 06:42 PM
It has too many flawsPosted on 03 February 2016 - 07:35 PM
We Don't Need New ELO System!!Last edited on 03 February 2016 - 08:01 PM by Cavasi
I can tell you don't know how elo works. We can't make it so you don't get drained when someone beats you. You can get it back if you truly deserve the elo. Your elo should be determined if you win/lose not the amount of hearts you have at the end of the gamePosted on 03 February 2016 - 11:25 PM
ELO is based on wins and loses not hearts as said above ^Posted on 04 February 2016 - 02:48 AM
Umm leave please you don't know what you on a bout and anyways Elo isn't based on heartsPosted on 04 February 2016 - 06:22 AM
um noPosted on 04 February 2016 - 08:01 AM
nupPosted on 04 February 2016 - 05:25 PM
Unwise wrote
Blergh! Not a pretty picture!
Posted on 04 February 2016 - 06:00 PM
NO! Don't base how many elo you get off of how many hearts you have!That it actually a stupid idea.
Posted on 04 February 2016 - 09:01 PM
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂