Posted on 04 April 2016 - 02:38 AM
-1.Its their own items, that they EARNT. They should be able to do whatever they want with it.
Posted on 08 April 2016 - 05:03 AM
this thread is horrible, there will never be a rule like thisPosted on 08 April 2016 - 07:15 AM
+1I like the Idea because it is bad sportsmanship in a way.
-1
Its also part of the game so idk.
I don't think it should be as long as a week. Maybe a day.
Last edited on 08 April 2016 - 05:29 PM by LordSuma
TatoxGuty wrote
Posted on 08 April 2016 - 09:33 AM
Teust wrote
I like the Idea because it is bad sportsmanship in a way.
-1
Its also part of the game so idk.
I don't think it should be as long as a week. Maybe a day.
Alright, well yes, the ban should probably be 2 days. Plus. i dont really think its a part of the game
Posted on 08 April 2016 - 03:56 PM
LordSuma wrote
TatoxGuty wrote...
Posted on 08 April 2016 - 05:32 PM
TatoxGuty wrote
LordSuma wrote...
Posted on 08 April 2016 - 05:44 PM
LordSuma wrote
TatoxGuty wrote...
Last edited on 09 April 2016 - 06:57 AM by Ads_
+1The whole point of killing someone should be to earn the extra gear to assist you in killing more people with more gear and healing.
If you snowball as a full iron and get 10 kills where every player burns their items, then you'd still be full iron (regardless of having 10 kills). Anyone who caved for this amount of time would be more geared than you, with enchants, diamonds and healing.
What I'm trying to say is, if this isn't punishable, it could get to a point where everyone starts burning their stuff, then you would gain no advantage from kills. Burning your items may be 'a part of the game', but killing to gain an advantage (eg. Snowballing) is surely a more valuable aspect of UHC.
Edit: I understand that this is a very extreme case (where everyone/almost everyone burns their items) but if people see others do this, and they know it isn't punishable, more people will start doing it.
Posted on 11 April 2016 - 08:26 AM
+1 for ffasI also want to point out that 'it's part of the game' is, simply put, the SHITTIEST ARGUMENT OF ALL TIME.
When you say this, you're essentially arguing that 'because things are how they are, they shouldn't change'. Where is the logic in that? There is none. 'The game' is open to change. This is minecraft, a game of limitless possibilities. 'The game' is just one of infinite configurations of a minecraft server. And you're saying that we shouldn't change to a more attractive configuration, 'just because'? Please check yourself.
Posted on 11 April 2016 - 11:53 AM
Those who +1 dont understand what UHC meansIt's a part of the game and this is the same with sg/factions
Posted on 12 April 2016 - 03:42 AM
H2Q wrote
It's a part of the game and this is the same with sg/factions
Posted on 12 April 2016 - 05:39 AM
LordSuma wrote
H2Q wrote...
It is. What isnt part of the game is when huahwi gets respawned when he gets ghost killed and burning stuff have been a huge thing since the reddit days
Posted on 12 April 2016 - 07:39 AM
ty_rex222 wrote
Posted on 12 April 2016 - 08:48 PM
-1 This is xompletely stupid, even thouh i dont do this its fucking ridiculous lol.Mutes are for chat offeces. Not for thrwong stuff in fire.
Cmon badlion atleast make some fucking sense.
Posted on 13 April 2016 - 04:10 AM
KaoticKaos wrote
Mutes are for chat offeces. Not for thrwong stuff in fire.
Cmon badlion atleast make some fucking sense.
Please read the post before calling it "fucking stupid"