Last edited on 15 June 2016 - 05:31 AM by Richqrd
On the appeal section, where you see:Status:
Staff Member:
There should be an additional column of how long the average wait time it is for certain staff members, for example when it is given to a senior staff member they are expected to be more busy than most so the wait time would be longer. It seems unfair when people wait quite a while, only to have their appeal denied for not responding within 24 hours because they have no idea when it will be seen.
Another button that could be added, would be after the time period, if the staff member still hasn't resolved the problem, the appealing player could click that button (only after the average wait time is over) to get it through to another staff member.
Thanks for listening!
Posted on 15 June 2016 - 06:49 AM
The unban date depends on the amount of previous bans.I'm not sure, but I think it's 2-4 months more per ban
Posted on 15 June 2016 - 07:43 AM
Lynkkis wrote
I'm not sure, but I think it's 2-4 months more per ban
Not talking about that, I am talking about how long it will take for a reply from certain staff members.
Posted on 15 June 2016 - 08:36 AM
Richqrd wrote
Lynkkis wrote...
Not talking about that, I am talking about how long it will take for a reply from certain staff members.
That's how I think it is, might be wrong though
Posted on 15 June 2016 - 01:21 PM
Richqrd wrote
Status:
Staff Member:
There should be an additional column of how long the average wait time it is for certain staff members, for example when it is given to a senior staff member they are expected to be more busy than most so the wait time would be longer. It seems unfair when people wait quite a while, only to have their appeal denied for not responding within 24 hours because they have no idea when it will be seen.
Another button that could be added, would be after the time period, if the staff member still hasn't resolved the problem, the appealing player could click that button (only after the average wait time is over) to get it through to another staff member.
Thanks for listening!
If I've misread something then please tell me.
Posted on 15 June 2016 - 01:34 PM
LegibleToe762 wrote
Richqrd wrote...
If I've misread something then please tell me.
Didn't think about that, what about people who deny gcheat bans etc not based on recorded evidence to know the timeframe they will need to wait?
Posted on 15 June 2016 - 01:49 PM
Richqrd wrote
LegibleToe762 wrote...
Didn't think about that, what about people who deny gcheat bans etc not based on recorded evidence to know the timeframe they will need to wait?
Appeals open to senior staff may take longer to get dealt with. There is no real time frame for those, it just depends on how active we are in doing appeals at that particular moment.