Posted on 09 November 2016 - 08:11 PM
Zaptelus wrote
cringiecake wrote...
Last edited on 09 November 2016 - 08:26 PM by *deleted-96553
Automatically DeletedPosted on 09 November 2016 - 08:50 PM
Zaptelus wrote
cringiecake wrote...
Your cousins are misinformed and you should do your own research instead of blindly taking their word.
Posted on 09 November 2016 - 10:13 PM
Automatically DeletedPosted on 09 November 2016 - 10:20 PM
Archybot wrote
YOUR
KNEE
Posted on 09 November 2016 - 11:15 PM
Zaptelus wrote
FunkyFactions wrote...
Trump hates illegal immagration
Posted on 09 November 2016 - 11:25 PM
Hexus wrote
SuperNeil64 wrote...
but i guess you'd rather keep living in an age that looks like the middle east today. Those countries never knew liberance and are still based on religion (like all the religious republican bullshit) Not everything is bad about republicanism of course.
mfw you have no idea what you are talking about..
>_<
Posted on 10 November 2016 - 03:34 AM
xIronMatt wrote
Hexus wrote...
mfw you have no idea what you are talking about..
>_<
I do, most republicans are super conservative and they want to keep everything that's old, whether it's good or not. They are afraid of new people, new things. Republicans are against change and change is why we evolved so fast the last 200 years. They will never vote for a new law if it's in contradiction with the bible.
Posted on 10 November 2016 - 03:43 AM
Hexus wrote
xIronMatt wrote...
I do, most republicans are super conservative and they want to keep everything that's old, whether it's good or not. They are afraid of new people, new things. Republicans are against change and change is why we evolved so fast the last 200 years. They will never vote for a new law if it's in contradiction with the bible.
Wrong and misinformed. Not all republicans are super conservative, and not even all conservatives are extremely religious. They aren't afraid of new people, or new things. Show me an example of this and i might believe you a bit. Republicans aren't against all change, again show me an example of this and enlighten me! Again, they aren't all religious and even a lot of religious people don't live by the bible like an all holy handbook, it's more of a guide to these people.
Posted on 10 November 2016 - 03:53 AM
Erouax wrote
Hexus wrote...
Wrong and misinformed. Not all republicans are super conservative, and not even all conservatives are extremely religious. They aren't afraid of new people, or new things. Show me an example of this and i might believe you a bit. Republicans aren't against all change, again show me an example of this and enlighten me! Again, they aren't all religious and even a lot of religious people don't live by the bible like an all holy handbook, it's more of a guide to these people.
When did I say all republicans? Abortion, gay marriage, getting rid of electoral college, ObamaCare (I heard Trump would also make a new one), immigration (new people)? Illegal immigration should stop, but not decent normal people! He clearly said he wanted to ban all incoming muslims from the US, which means also productive people without a criminal past.
It's a wonder that Obama got ObamaCare launched with the republican senate voting all progressive ideas away. It looks like they just want to go 2 decades back.
And btw to the other guy electoral college is because all states want a bit of their own policy I think
Posted on 10 November 2016 - 03:57 AM
Blaszczak wrote
He is the most under qualified candidate for the presidency. He does horrific things. Both Clinton and Trump arent amazing but Clinton is the one. Trump hasn't payed federal taxes in the past 18 years, which is illegal, he has harassed women and men, made women feel powerless, he does not follow the rules of the debates. His twitter got closed for a period of time because he got mad at SNL for talking bad at him so he started talking back. How are we suppose to trust someone that gets mad so easily with government nuclear codes…. Clinton on the other had has experience. She has been secretary of state in New York, first lady, etc. She works in the buisness of politics for years while Trump has a strong business background. This is not an election for the CEO of a company but moreso the president of our country. Trump wants to takeep away the 2nd amendment which he is not allowed to do since it is submerged deeply in the constitution. He claims that he will build a wall and make Mexico pay for it, which is also not possible because Mexico will not pay for it and Trump would not pay for it because that would be a huge cost. What has this presidency come to lol
Anyone with half a brain knows that Trump isn't a leader and merely a figurehead, he will appoint people to lead for him. What horrific things? They aren't the best candidates, but since Hillary is literally everything wrong with American politics in one person, i'd rather not encourage such things. Trump may have been accused of harassing people, doesn't mean it's true (and most of them have been proven false). He doesn't have problems controlling his temper, at all. Hillary may have some experience, but her sheer lack of respect for everyone in America, and her clear thirst for power, and corruption, i'd rather her not be in charge of the most powerful state. I won't lie, neither of them are the best, but if Shillary didn't rig the primaries against Bernie, then he would've beaten Trump, as a LOT of people voted for the Trump over the DNC due to her being so corrupt. Luckily Trump won :^)
TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP
Posted on 10 November 2016 - 03:58 AM
We had a mock election at school.Results:
Clinton: 435 votes
Trump: 12 votes
Johnson: 4 votes
Stein: 1 vote
You see we're smart people.
Also, Washington DC was pretty smart as well, 92% of votes went to Clinton.
Posted on 10 November 2016 - 08:00 AM
Sublurring wrote
Results:
Clinton: 435 votes
Trump: 12 votes
Johnson: 4 votes
Stein: 1 vote
You see we're smart people.
Also, Washington DC was pretty smart as well, 92% of votes went to Clinton.
Do you think it's smart to vote for a criminal ?
Posted on 10 November 2016 - 08:19 AM
xIronMatt wrote
Sublurring wrote...
Do you think it's smart to vote for a criminal ?
Posted on 10 November 2016 - 08:36 AM
inshift wrote
xIronMatt wrote...
Posted on 10 November 2016 - 09:31 AM
@SuperNeil64 Clinton won the majority. More people voted for Clinton than trump, but Trump just got the better states with more electorals. He was lucky enough to switch some swing states like Florida, ohio, and penn.Posted on 10 November 2016 - 09:45 AM
Blaszczak wrote
Popular vote is just a number, you have a lot to learn.
Posted on 10 November 2016 - 11:32 AM
SuperNeil64 wrote
Blaszczak wrote...
Popular vote is just a number, you have a lot to learn.
I know very well how the election works, but im just saying that because you said "America knew what was bad" or whatever and thats false b/c more people voted for her
Posted on 10 November 2016 - 12:35 PM
Archybot wrote
YOUR
KNEE
Posted on 10 November 2016 - 01:00 PM
Sublurring wrote
Results:
Clinton: 435 votes
Trump: 12 votes
Johnson: 4 votes
Stein: 1 vote
You see we're smart people.
Also, Washington DC was pretty smart as well, 92% of votes went to Clinton.
It's the kind of liberal arrogance that cost her the election.