Posted on 29 December 2016 - 11:50 AM
how much fps would this pc get in minecraft?I didn't just buy it for minecraft lol
these are the specs-
Intel Core i7-6700K 4.0GHz Quad-Core Processor
Corsair H100i v2 70.7 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler
MSI Z170A KRAIT GAMING 3X ATX LGA1151 Motherboard
(2x) Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 Memory
Crucial MX300 525GB 2.5" Solid State Drive
Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive
1080 nvidia video card
Corsair 750D ATX Full Tower Case
Corsair RMx 1000W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply
Asus Xonar DGX 24-bit 96 KHz Sound Card
Microsoft Windows 10 Home OEM 64-bit
Posted on 29 December 2016 - 01:18 PM
more than you need lolPosted on 29 December 2016 - 02:12 PM
That is a very high end PC, the fact you are asking if you would have enough fps in minecraft with it is concerning.Posted on 29 December 2016 - 04:25 PM
Emendate wrote
read the top
Posted on 29 December 2016 - 04:25 PM
FunkyFactions wrote
how much
Posted on 29 December 2016 - 04:28 PM
Automatically DeletedPosted on 05 January 2017 - 09:29 PM
EhhThing wrote
_nightpvp_ wrote...
You should be able to stay at over 100fps 99.99999999999999999998% of the time.
Last edited on 05 January 2017 - 09:40 PM by *deleted-191881
Automatically DeletedLast edited on 05 January 2017 - 09:44 PM by euree
EhhThing wrote
dicd wrote...
No… Just because you have 144hz monitor does not mean you can see 144hz. There is absolutely no point in having anything over 100hz (60hz for most people.) Especially for Minecraft.
"no point in having anything over 100hz unless you're going into esports" well actually if you'd ever been lucky enough to play around with a 144hz monitor, you'd be crying by the time you got home, and this is coming from someone who owns a 60hz monitor yet has experienced a 144hz monitor multiple times. twice the refresh rate looks so much smoother and more aesthetically pleasing, so "60hz being fine for most people" doesnt really make any sense.
Posted on 05 January 2017 - 09:42 PM
Automatically DeletedPosted on 05 January 2017 - 09:43 PM
EhhThing wrote
dicd wrote...
Read my edited response.
Posted on 05 January 2017 - 09:51 PM
Automatically DeletedPosted on 05 January 2017 - 09:53 PM
Zaptelus wrote
dicd wrote...
Posted on 05 January 2017 - 09:54 PM
Automatically DeletedPosted on 05 January 2017 - 09:54 PM
Automatically DeletedPosted on 05 January 2017 - 09:55 PM
EhhThing wrote
dicd wrote...
You misunderstand me. I meant that 60hz is good for the causal gamer (which is a majority of people who play games.) However, between 100hz and 144hz; there isn't much difference.
Posted on 05 January 2017 - 09:55 PM
I don't know the exact numbers, but they'll be high. More than you actually need. The human eye normally sees things in 60 FPS, and anything over like 120 doesn't have a noticeable change, so you're good. You'll be getting numbers much higher than that.Posted on 05 January 2017 - 10:00 PM
Automatically DeletedPosted on 05 January 2017 - 10:02 PM
EhhThing wrote
dicd wrote...
Sorry. Between 100fps and 144fps there isn't much difference.
Posted on 05 January 2017 - 10:04 PM
Automatically Deleted