Last edited on 23 January 2017 - 11:03 AM by Unsightable
dild wrote
SKKRRRRRRRRRRRRT wrote...
EXACTLY what I expected, you won't get Diamond in a 'ladder that takes no skill' - because you can't! You just use the classic 'I have better things to do' excuse, you sure did have enough time to cheat for almost 200 Build matches though?
Posted on 23 January 2017 - 11:11 AM
SKKRRRRRRRRRRRRT wrote
dild wrote...
EXACTLY what I expected, you won't get Diamond in a 'ladder that takes no skill' - because you can't! You just use the classic 'I have better things to do' excuse, you sure did have enough time to cheat for almost 200 Build matches though?
Posted on 23 January 2017 - 11:31 AM
dild wrote
SKKRRRRRRRRRRRRT wrote...
you can never beat me in nodebuff
i am better than you
=
skill
Posted on 23 January 2017 - 12:05 PM
I have a feeling that you're armodaPosted on 23 January 2017 - 12:31 PM
someone on an alt looking for attention lolPosted on 23 January 2017 - 12:52 PM
dild wrote
SKKRRRRRRRRRRRRT wrote...
One thing i'll agree with you on is that potion on this server has gone downhill, a lot, the hits feel off and the KB is very inconsistent, so I don't entirely blame you for not wanting to play NoDebuff on Badlion, but that really doesn't change the fact that NoDebuff takes more skill than BuildUHC, no matter what server we are talking about.
Here's a prime example of most BuildUHC players:
https://www.badlion.net/profile/user/mativapes
His BuildUHC stats: Emerald II, 1040-346
His NoDebuff stats: BRONZE II, 3-49
In Build, you could have the worst aim, the worst timing, the worst archery, but if you play like enough of a bitch, you will get a high rating. And how hard can it be to play like a bitch in a ladder that includes 2 lavas, 2 waters, a bow with 64 arrows and a rod?
Now when these types of BuildUHC players (i'm not referring to all of them) try to play NoDebuff, a ladder where you can't play like a cunt to win, they get absolutely shat on. You can probably see where i'm going with this now, right? BuildUHC isn't a bad ladder, it's just that a lot of people take advantage of how easy it is to scum off everyone with the various items to win fights.
Posted on 23 January 2017 - 01:35 PM
SKKRRRRRRRRRRRRT wrote
dild wrote...
One thing i'll agree with you on is that potion on this server has gone downhill, a lot, the hits feel off and the KB is very inconsistent, so I don't entirely blame you for not wanting to play NoDebuff on Badlion, but that really doesn't change the fact that NoDebuff takes more skill than BuildUHC, no matter what server we are talking about.
Here's a prime example of most BuildUHC players:
https://www.badlion.net/profile/user/mativapes
His BuildUHC stats: Emerald II, 1040-346
His NoDebuff stats: BRONZE II, 3-49
In Build, you could have the worst aim, the worst timing, the worst archery, but if you play like enough of a bitch, you will get a high rating. And how hard can it be to play like a bitch in a ladder that includes 2 lavas, 2 waters, a bow with 64 arrows and a rod?
Now when these types of BuildUHC players (i'm not referring to all of them) try to play NoDebuff, a ladder where you can't play like a cunt to win, they get absolutely shat on. You can probably see where i'm going with this now, right? BuildUHC isn't a bad ladder, it's just that a lot of people take advantage of how easy it is to scum off everyone with the various items to win fights.
As you can probably tell from that thread, I despise of the meta that BuildUHC encourages. However, something as barebones as NoDebuff doesn't interest me either. This is why I don't even enjoy playing Minecraft anymore, because NoDebuff is a pointless game of point and click, the lack of variety makes it boring. However, BuildUHC is boring because of the slow paced and passive play style that the items in the kit encourage.
Posted on 23 January 2017 - 01:51 PM
Kaspen wrote
iBlueApple wrote...
no, kaspen
Kaspen is a cheater
Posted on 23 January 2017 - 02:01 PM
iBlueApple wrote
Kaspen wrote...
Kaspen is a cheater
no cheat just kaspen :D
Posted on 23 January 2017 - 02:27 PM
SKKRRRRRRRRRRRRT wrote
dild wrote...
One thing i'll agree with you on is that potion on this server has gone downhill, a lot, the hits feel off and the KB is very inconsistent, so I don't entirely blame you for not wanting to play NoDebuff on Badlion, but that really doesn't change the fact that NoDebuff takes more skill than BuildUHC, no matter what server we are talking about.
Here's a prime example of most BuildUHC players:
https://www.badlion.net/profile/user/mativapes
His BuildUHC stats: Emerald II, 1040-346
His NoDebuff stats: BRONZE II, 3-49
In Build, you could have the worst aim, the worst timing, the worst archery, but if you play like enough of a bitch, you will get a high rating. And how hard can it be to play like a bitch in a ladder that includes 2 lavas, 2 waters, a bow with 64 arrows and a rod?
Now when these types of BuildUHC players (i'm not referring to all of them) try to play NoDebuff, a ladder where you can't play like a cunt to win, they get absolutely shat on. You can probably see where i'm going with this now, right? BuildUHC isn't a bad ladder, it's just that a lot of people take advantage of how easy it is to scum off everyone with the various items to win fights.
Last edited on 23 January 2017 - 02:30 PM by ISS
ThatOneCombosDad wrote
SKKRRRRRRRRRRRRT wrote...
it wouldnt be a real badlion thread without players flaming other players with no reasoning.
Posted on 23 January 2017 - 02:31 PM
iss wrote
ThatOneCombosDad wrote...
it wouldnt be a real badlion thread without players flaming other players with no reasoning.
Last edited on 23 January 2017 - 02:37 PM by KarliXon
I wonder who this is, definitely didn't figure out in 2 seconds of the video ;)also you cheat blatantly get banned eZ bro
Posted on 23 January 2017 - 02:41 PM
ThatOneCombosDad wrote
SKKRRRRRRRRRRRRT wrote...
Excuse me?
Posted on 23 January 2017 - 02:42 PM
SKKRRRRRRRRRRRRT wrote
ThatOneCombosDad wrote...
Excuse me?
Posted on 23 January 2017 - 03:23 PM
iss wrote
iBlueApple wrote...
no cheat just kaspen :D
yes this is correct