Store
Subscribe
Screen Sharing
Yeah - tbf i agree
 0
PM Link
Yeah let's let people look through my files. Oh wait, my irl name and personal info is right there in the open and of course they have to go through it. True story
 1
PM Link
harambe
 2
PM Link

Zaptelus wrote

Alpha527 wrote...

If you have hacks on your PC but you never used it on the server you're being ss'd on.

you can't get banned for having cheats on your pc unless the mods can prove that you used them,but some shitty servers ban if you have injection clients on your pc
 0
PM Link

Jinxful wrote

I got screenshared on Lounge a few weeks ago. Even though I had nothing to hide I was still scepticle about letting a random person roam through my computer, my own property . It's an invasion of privacy most importantly and it would be unprofessional and impractical of badlion to start screensharing. It is a really inefficient way of getting rid of cheaters, especially on a large server like badlion, so there is really no point of adding this unless:

It's a high profile tournament ( screenshares took place anyway)


This, also a large amount of people do not correctly know how to screenshare. @Vykz is someone who is very good at doing it and knows how it all works.
 0
PM Link

Alpha527 wrote

Magiclz wrote...

? How could you false ban lol

I'm guessing a player might get banned for having an illegal mod / client downloaded even though they did not use it on badlion / at the time of being frozen
 0
PM Link
i think if your banned from lounge or other screensharing servers permanently, and people suspect someone to be cheating, Badlion should look more into it.
 0
PM Link

skwurtle wrote

i think if your banned from lounge or other screensharing servers permanently, and people suspect someone to be cheating, Badlion should look more into it.

Maybe, they already do a lot of "looking into it" already. This might help and might not, all depends on the person/type of hack/environment.

 0
PM Link

Heffernan wrote

skwurtle wrote...


Maybe, they already do a lot of "looking into it" already. This might help and might not, all depends on the person/type of hack/environment.



i know people who are accused of cheating and are banned on lounge perm meaning you cant buy a unban, and are currently on leaderboards.
 0
PM Link
too many cheaters to screenshare them all
 1
PM Link

Struggles wrote

too many cheaters to screenshare them all


Badlion is such a big network and with all their gamemodes, it would just be too hectic. Just take UHC for example, if someone needed to be SS'd in a UHC and your the only one in there (host). Who is going to take care of the game while it runs. Also that poor dude might not be cheating and someone might come along and kill him.

Screensharing just doesn't belong on Badlion network. That's as simple as that

Regards,
Heffernan
 0
PM Link
Vykz coming in so ya better self destruct
 0
PM Link
Time consuming and evades privacy. -1
 2
PM Link
Well I don't believe a lot of false bans would occur because staff would be educated. I believe more false bans could come from evidence uploaded by mods. But screen sharing first of all, takes a considerable amount of time, second it doesn't always find the client especially with autoclickers and the release of vape lite, forth it is an invasion of privacy to a certain extent, fifth we would have to educate the staff, sixth we would need translators for a lot of players due to the fact that badlion is a diverse community, seventh join.me and different screensharing problems have issues, eighth badlion premium defeats the need of it. That pretty much sums it up. I have wanted to screen share in the past or have the option to but it does come with a lot of problems. I personally have been ssed 73 time since April of 2016 which has wasted over 30 hours of my time so as a player it can get frustrating. I also have been false banned for vape and other clients due to staff not knowing what they are doing. Screen sharing can work successfully like we have seen on minehq but it needs a good infrastructure behind it which badlion is not set up to do. With badlin premuim I don't believe it is worth badlions time. Rant done.
 0
PM Link
The only way a false ban can occur is if the person screensharing the player is a complete fucking dickwad and flat out an imbecile. Some servers ban you for owning clients or auto clickers, whereas MineHQ and I myself agree to this, that you should only be banned if you're using the cheat. Whether it's a client or auto clicker, we need hardcore evidence you were using it.

Invasion of privacy huh? Guess that's why Badlion screenshared for the CTF tournament right? No offense but I wouldn't let a single Badlion staff (below admin) screenshare me. Because I guarantee more than half of you won't know what the fuck you're doing or what to look for. My screensharing that I do is all within "privacy" limits. I don't look through any personal files. I make you download a PUBLIC program that acts like Windows Task Manager and I take it from there, looking ONLY at your minecraft. Other servers go to great lengths and I think it's pretty fucking dumb. The only servers that do that are the ones that don't know how to screenshare. Recently, a lot of my twitter DMs have been asking on whether or not something was a false ban etc. and for the most part it is. It's just a general fact that staff on low bootleg end servers are idiots. Some might be smart, but most are not.

Premium is something that was meant to stop cheating and give a better gameplay experience that lots of people enjoy. While it does stop the cheating, how many people actually USE premium? Haven't seen that many numbers on it grow so I can only assume only the people doing 128 TPS 1v1s. Also, not every staff would screenshare. Only a select few that actually have a brain, no offense. The more staff using methods = more likely for it to be patched. This leads to screensharing being pointless. Why do you think I keep any method I have to find clients to myself?

Screensharing is effective and efficient if done by the right person. Literally takes me 5 minutes max to just check to see if someone is using a client or not. Autoclickers — I'll let server side anti cheats handle that.
 0
PM Link

Vykz wrote

The only way a false ban can occur is if the person screensharing the player is a complete fucking dickwad and flat out an imbecile. Some servers ban you for owning clients or auto clickers, whereas MineHQ and I myself agree to this, that you should only be banned if you're using the cheat. Whether it's a client or auto clicker, we need hardcore evidence you were using it.

Invasion of privacy huh? Guess that's why Badlion screenshared for the CTF tournament right? No offense but I wouldn't let a single Badlion staff (below admin) screenshare me. Because I guarantee more than half of you won't know what the fuck you're doing or what to look for. My screensharing that I do is all within "privacy" limits. I don't look through any personal files. I make you download a PUBLIC program that acts like Windows Task Manager and I take it from there, looking ONLY at your minecraft. Other servers go to great lengths and I think it's pretty fucking dumb. The only servers that do that are the ones that don't know how to screenshare. Recently, a lot of my twitter DMs have been asking on whether or not something was a false ban etc. and for the most part it is. It's just a general fact that staff on low bootleg end servers are idiots. Some might be smart, but most are not.

Premium is something that was meant to stop cheating and give a better gameplay experience that lots of people enjoy. While it does stop the cheating, how many people actually USE premium? Haven't seen that many numbers on it grow so I can only assume only the people doing 128 TPS 1v1s. Also, not every staff would screenshare. Only a select few that actually have a brain, no offense. The more staff using methods = more likely for it to be patched. This leads to screensharing being pointless. Why do you think I keep any method I have to find clients to myself?

Screensharing is effective and efficient if done by the right person. Literally takes me 5 minutes max to just check to see if someone is using a client or not. Autoclickers — I'll let server side anti cheats handle that.


Yeah because you so find those methods yourself noob
 0
PM Link

Erouax wrote

Vykz wrote...



Yeah because you so find those methods yourself noob
shut up mr. "What were those handles again? xoxo"
 0
PM Link

Vykz wrote

My screensharing that I do is all within "privacy" limits.

Too bad you don't decide what privacy limits are.
 4
PM Link
im pregnant
 1
PM Link

HalfCreeper wrote

Vykz wrote...


Too bad you don't decide what privacy limits are.
Which is why I put the quote around privacy. Everyone has their own view on the word privacy.
 0
PM Link