Posted on 15 October 2017 - 06:49 AM
OUA wrote
It glitches out so many times in that video lol. To make something that truly thinks and acts like a human is not super easy. To make something that you spam movements and attacks to get closer and attack a target is not hard >_>
Posted on 15 October 2017 - 06:52 AM
All of you people saying bots are better than people.Imma teel u a gay cringy ass story
So there is a cubing community ( a community which solves Rubik's fast)
So there is a type of event called Rubik's cube Fewest Moves. As the names says it someone has to solve the Rubik's cube in least moves possible. The world record in the past for the fewest moves was 20 moves, and some of ypu guys may know the gods algorithm which basically solves a cube in 20 moves. Today if you look at the WCA (world cubing association) world records page
https://www.worldcubeassociation.org/results/regions.php the fewest moves WR is 19 moves and is achieved by 3 people. Hence, humans are better.
Posted on 15 October 2017 - 08:18 AM
Pika12X wrote
KarliXon wrote...
Ok, the bot will be beaten soon
the bot has been beaten but will never be beaten again because the bot learns everything the players do against him, making it impossible to beat him twice in a row and soon will be simply impossible to beat at all
Posted on 15 October 2017 - 11:21 AM
Will be nearly impossible to design a bot that varies playstyles and other things that makes it like a playerPosted on 15 October 2017 - 02:19 PM
Pika12X wrote
Imma teel u a gay cringy ass story
So there is a cubing community ( a community which solves Rubik's fast)
So there is a type of event called Rubik's cube Fewest Moves. As the names says it someone has to solve the Rubik's cube in least moves possible. The world record in the past for the fewest moves was 20 moves, and some of ypu guys may know the gods algorithm which basically solves a cube in 20 moves. Today if you look at the WCA (world cubing association) world records page
https://www.worldcubeassociation.org/results/regions.php the fewest moves WR is 19 moves and is achieved by 3 people. Hence, humans are better.
Tl;dr bots are still better than humans
Posted on 16 October 2017 - 04:47 AM
KarliXon wrote
Pika12X wrote...
the bot has been beaten but will never be beaten again because the bot learns everything the players do against him, making it impossible to beat him twice in a row and soon will be simply impossible to beat at all
It will be beaten down soon.
Posted on 16 October 2017 - 12:43 PM
Pika12X wrote
KarliXon wrote...
It will be beaten down soon.
it will not be beaten
Posted on 16 October 2017 - 06:29 PM
Hotpvp has a lot of working pvp bots+1 good idea for soup, gapple and combo
Posted on 18 October 2017 - 05:22 AM
I will try to create the gui of the bot during the holidays just for the prévues :)Posted on 18 October 2017 - 05:26 PM
Automatically DeletedPosted on 19 October 2017 - 08:50 AM
wpc wrote
Posted on 19 October 2017 - 11:05 AM
Pika12X wrote
KarliXon wrote...
It will be beaten down soon.
Read up on machine learning. Bots cam account for every single possible keystroke input and counter it. At the end of the day, every high level player is just making keystrokes based on what he sees, just like in chess a high level player is able to see what's happening and make moves based on that. While a professional level chess player can look ahead 10 or even 15 moves (I'm no pro lmao), bots can look ahead hundreds. They can look ahead hundreds of moves and perfectly counter them the same way they can look ahead thousands of keystrokes and perfectly counter them. Humans cannot compute the same data as bots can nor do they have the same reaction time, which means that it's physically impossible for humans to be better.
Posted on 19 October 2017 - 11:14 AM
+1 but probably to hard to developePosted on 21 October 2017 - 08:12 PM
+1Posted on 24 October 2017 - 09:30 AM
+1 nice idea, they would however need to be very advanced. A few pvp servers already have pvp bots, but they all have some issues with them. So I guess even if they start working on this, it will take long.