Last edited on 09 November 2017 - 03:12 AM by DCousins_II
Just state your opinions here. I think that it changes based on the region. Don't argue in this thread, it's just people's opinion.My opinion is:
NA and EU: 1800-1900 (high player base and more players)
SA: 1700? (I have no idea about the south american player base etc)
AU: 1600-1700 (Me, being from au, know that there are rarely more than 50 players online in arena and the highest rated player is 1900, who is a cheater that has been banned)
I'd like to hear your opinions, and be sure to state a reason why. I'm sure that you guys will all have different definitions of "good" and who knows, maybe your elo isn't the deciding factor to whether you're good or not.
EDIT: The ratings that I have stated are for builduhc, I'm not really sure about the other kits because barely anyone plays them on AU
Last edited on 09 November 2017 - 03:24 AM by MechaOperator
I'd say that 1700 is pretty good too, but again it's my opinion on it, but the level skill seems to be higher there, I mean, when I fight a 1600 and 1700 I can tell there is a significant change in the game sense and skill level, 1900 is or should be a level for players that are better in terms of game sense and technics but I would consider someone good if he has 1700 elo at leastLast edited on 09 November 2017 - 03:39 AM by OUA
Even tho I'm bad my opinion isEu average 1800-1900
Na average 1700-1800
Sa average 1700
Au average 1600
Why I put Eu above NA it's simple theres a gap between the two regions maybe Eu have more cheaters or more try hards who knows.
Sa I never played or seen players but it get some what decent player count.
Au I believe it has below average player Base and the people that play are really good but people use AU as boosting region instead of playing.
Posted on 09 November 2017 - 03:50 AM
OUA wrote
Eu average 1800-1900
Na average 1700-1800
Sa average 1700
Au average 1600
Why I put Eu above NA it's simple theres a gap between the two regions maybe Eu have more cheaters or more try hards who knows.
Sa I never played or seen players but it get some what decent player count.
Au I believe it has below average player Base and the people that play are really good but people use AU as boosting region instead of playing.
I agree with everything you say except for au being a boosting region. There is a small au community and I've only seen one person boosting on Au so far. I think the only reason that Au players ratings aren't as high as eu or na is because of the playerbase
Posted on 09 November 2017 - 03:52 AM
Audii0_o wrote
Yeah, that seems reasonable. Most australian people would be able to get on the global leaderboards if au had more of a playerbase, or if they moved to na, but I agree that 1700 is good. (Sorry, I'm taking everything to au probs because im from au xD)
Posted on 09 November 2017 - 04:34 AM
Affirms wrote
OUA wrote...
I agree with everything you say except for au being a boosting region. There is a small au community and I've only seen one person boosting on Au so far. I think the only reason that Au players ratings aren't as high as eu or na is because of the playerbase
My bad i poorly explained it EU and Na players go to Au to boost on their alt that's what i meant.
Posted on 09 November 2017 - 06:36 AM
CoalPosted on 09 November 2017 - 07:51 AM
This season the only competitive ladder on au is build uhc. Skillwise a player who can get 1600 elo at bow kits on na/eu could get 1800+ on auPosted on 09 November 2017 - 03:40 PM
Ryankoo1 wrote
Yeah, we need to find a way to get more au people. If there were 50 people on arena from 12pm - 7pm, it would be really good. But I'd say it's harder to get elo on au, just due to the playerbase. As I said earlier, if Australian servers had as many people as american servers, there'd be a lot more aussies on the leaderboards
Posted on 09 November 2017 - 04:36 PM
i agreePosted on 09 November 2017 - 04:40 PM
Rn 1800 is good for build1700 is good for other ladders
But for the end of the season 2.1k build and 1900 for other ladders is good
Posted on 09 November 2017 - 06:24 PM
If you think about it, half of people will fall below 1400 because they're below average and lose more than they win, but I'd say "good" is anyone 1700+, great is 2000+Posted on 10 November 2017 - 09:11 AM
i can't say much for sa and eu but I think 2000 elo is pretty good for na and eu. im at 1900 and everyone plays super annoying lolPosted on 10 November 2017 - 05:15 PM
A good rating will continually change during a season, at the start it will be around 1600-1700, when people start reaching 2k it'll start too be 1900-2000 and now in the season, 2.1k-2.2k is a good elo, bare in mind this is only for build, however all kits inflate in this way eventually, along with Global. So it's hard to give an exact answer.Posted on 11 November 2017 - 11:04 AM
JuztChicken wrote
Pretty accurate answer from the chicken man
Posted on 11 November 2017 - 11:54 AM
OUA wrote
Eu average 1800-1900
Na average 1700-1800
Sa average 1700
Au average 1600
Why I put Eu above NA it's simple theres a gap between the two regions maybe Eu have more cheaters or more try hards who knows.
Sa I never played or seen players but it get some what decent player count.
Au I believe it has below average player Base and the people that play are really good but people use AU as boosting region instead of playing.
yeep eu definitely has more tryhards
Last edited on 11 November 2017 - 01:55 PM by zidnauj
NA: 1800SA: 1700
EU: I never play on eu but I think 1800 or 1900 is good