Last edited on 02 April 2018 - 04:42 AM by Bluiishh
officialarrow wrote
Are you dumb or something? I just asked about your opinion about it and vote what you enjoy more. This aint a thread where I say I want MMR for some shitty reason. No need to be negative all the time…
Posted on 02 April 2018 - 06:47 AM
mmr is all about playing more to get higher in the leader-boards its not as fun elo is if ur good ur a gonna have high stats end offff. shit idea from a shit player not trying to be nasty but ur freLOPosted on 02 April 2018 - 07:09 AM
Awizeuh wrote
YEAH
Last edited on 02 April 2018 - 07:12 AM by Bluiishh
NastyHulk wrote
Stop shittalking lmfao. Its a thread where I asked you to vote. Not your opinion about my skills. You clearly know nothing about ELO btw. Look at my BedWars stats. I get 1 ELO from 1900(or less) and -32 from 1900(or less).How is ELO better then?
Posted on 02 April 2018 - 09:05 AM
tahppp wrote
KEERQQ wrote...
Are you talking about Kera or me?
Posted on 02 April 2018 - 09:10 AM
tahppp wrote
KEERQQ wrote...
I'm going to report you to forum ban you.
Posted on 02 April 2018 - 09:30 AM
KEERQQ wrote
tahppp wrote...
I'm going to report you to forum ban you.
Posted on 02 April 2018 - 09:51 AM
tahppp wrote
KEERQQ wrote...
Lol yeah KERA is really retarded. Nobody likes him…
Posted on 02 April 2018 - 10:13 AM
Bluiishh wrote
tahppp wrote...
Lol yeah KERA is really retarded. Nobody likes him…
Ok
Posted on 02 April 2018 - 02:11 PM
tahppp wrote
I feel like everybody likes MMR now…
Posted on 02 April 2018 - 02:12 PM
I prefer ELO, but not this system. If a randy of 1400 ELO wins me because they're very pro and it's their first time and I'm 1950+, I lose 31 points with no chance of recovering my ELO on them. Maybe you may think "Yes, it's fair, because there's no way of knowing if they're pro or noob". OK, you're quite right. But there's no actual solution in the nowadays system. I purpose DA adjustment that should be made in my opinion: base the ELO system in consistency (see this chess websitefor more clarification). That means that, if you have 0 ranked matches played and you win a player with 1950+, you get a lot of ELO so that you get closer to your real ELO very quickly, and the loser, as he will have had to play a lot to get to there, his punctuation will get slightly lower (not as if he has lost to someone their level but less than now). Example of me in my first Racing King's game :D
This change in the ELO system will also encourage players with much punctuation to enable the fair match opponent mode, as, if you lose, you won't lose 16 ELO, because of your consistency.
Maybe MMR could be also a solution, but as I do not now it quite well, I would choose the system I've just explained.
Posted on 02 April 2018 - 02:17 PM
fulanit0 wrote

This change in the ELO system will also encourage players with much punctuation to enable the fair match opponent mode, as, if you lose, you won't lose 16 ELO, because of your consistency.
Maybe MMR could be also a solution, but as I do not now it quite well, I would choose the system I've just explained.
I still prefer MMR.
The matchmaking system [not placed] is REALLY good since you only fight like s4-gold3s. Thats a simple small and perm solution for the thing you said.
Posted on 02 April 2018 - 02:24 PM
MaskedBeauty wrote
MMR IS THE SUPERIOR
Posted on 02 April 2018 - 02:25 PM
DKN wrote
MaskedBeauty wrote...
MMR IS THE SUPERIOR
MMR IS OUR KING
Posted on 02 April 2018 - 06:53 PM
MMRIS
NOT
COMING
BACK
just accept what we have instead of complaining about what rating system the server uses. The worst players are still at the bottom and the best players are still at the top.
Last edited on 02 April 2018 - 11:16 PM by iUHQ
jarecl wrote
IS
NOT
COMING
BACK
just accept what we have instead of complaining about what rating system the server uses. The worst players are still at the bottom and the best players are still at the top.
They said the same thing about elo not coming back, and here we are with elo back so….