Posted on 12 November 2015 - 11:47 AM
so what you are saying is that if I have 1100 elo and i win against a 2100 elo guy, I would get only maximum of 5 elo?!?!?!And if the 2100 guy defeated me, he would get 10 elo??
honestly you are crazy.
Posted on 12 November 2015 - 11:50 AM
Omg you didn't understand…. If you win you would get at least 10 elo, if you lose you would lose maximum 5 eloThanks for replying <3
Posted on 12 November 2015 - 04:04 PM
xJqnYT wrote
Thanks for replying <3
Which basically means that the ELO will fluctuate so badly. I disagree with this, our current system is smart.
Instead of punishing a player who lost against a better person, they only lose a small amount, saying "Oh, it's alright. I played a better person, I was supposed to lose".
When the higher ELO wins, the message is displaying "You won against someone who is not as good as you. Here's a tiny prize for not really accomplishing much".
Posted on 12 November 2015 - 04:05 PM
-1 Gberry said If you dont wanna lose elo then dont losePosted on 12 November 2015 - 04:05 PM
Uh maybe the 1300s aren't hacking and you just suckTerrible idea -1
Posted on 12 November 2015 - 04:43 PM
No thanks. I think this would unbalance the elo not balance.Posted on 12 November 2015 - 05:02 PM
xJqnYT wrote
I wouldn't if I were you…
Posted on 12 November 2015 - 07:59 PM
"I am a try hard"my ass you are, you barley have a 1700
Posted on 12 November 2015 - 10:37 PM
VedExcellence wrote
And if the 2100 guy defeated me, he would get 10 elo??
honestly you are crazy.
Rocket scientist logic right there
Posted on 13 November 2015 - 07:38 AM
OnlyAura wrote
xJqnYT wrote...
I wouldn't if I were you…
@trHowy you suck, fix your shit
Posted on 13 November 2015 - 11:04 AM
Do people not even read pinned threads before they post their "amazing ideas".https://www.badlion.net/forum/thread/76552
Elo system is not changing.
Posted on 14 November 2015 - 02:10 AM
This thread got too much hate, so I'm denying it. I know I did a mistake, thanks for all the replies <3