Posted on 04 April 2016 - 10:37 PM
Hivlik wrote
Sorry for exciting you by quoting this post of yours, but I'm doing it to tell you that I'm going to hold out on answering this question until the weekend. I've got some diagramming to do, and since school resumes tomorrow, I can't be bothered to do it right now. These new questions are pretty interesting, yk?
Posted on 04 April 2016 - 10:45 PM
SuperSubh3561 wrote
Yes, but I feel a lot more Kashmiri from the inside. Hashtag Pakistan cricket team and all that, boom boom Afridi. He's not retiring by the way, would you believe it? How many times has he retired and returned like that? It's comical, but I can't stop myself from liking the guy. He's an idol, a symbol of hope for us impulse-driven people on this planet. He misses a lot of the time, but when he hits, it's into the stands. Chris "Four Runs" Gayle has nothing on him. Not even Carlos Braithwaite with his four sixes could shatter that. Remember the name!
Posted on 04 April 2016 - 10:57 PM
SuperSubh3561 wrote
That depends on context. If their intention was to fail an objective, it's a success. If "succeeds" is being used here purely as a form of ironic humor to describe someone intending to succeed, it's a failure. "To succeed" and "success" don't exactly have the same meaning when used like that. If I said that the government has only ever succeeded in failing its citizens, I'm implying that the government is meant to not fail its citizens, and that the government has not succeeded in doing anything but that. I could remove the verb succeed altogether, but then I'd lose the humor factor. The first scenario is a bit more interesting because you can argue that it's a failure because an objective was failed, but it's simply a matter of perspective from there. Suppose I assign a task to Isabella. She intentionally fails to do the task; from my perspective, it's a failure because the task I assigned was not completed, but it's a success from her perspective because her true objective was to fail my task.
Posted on 04 April 2016 - 11:07 PM
w5t wrote
If so, from where to where were you going?
Yeah, lots of times. Generally, I travel to the UK or Kashmir/India because I have relatives there. The flights can be pretty long if you're going nonstop to places that far, and sometimes it's hard to keep yourself entertained. The most entertaining thing I've encountered on an airplane was the mango pickle. Some British company made some small box like you find with jam containing the staple blood-red pickle mixed with some mystery orange jam colored substance. I dunno what that was supposed to be, but boy those darn chavs dunno how to do anything right!
Last edited on 04 April 2016 - 11:21 PM by Morsinius
Teracerus wrote
Of course! Luck exists everywhere–even from the day we're born.
Teracerus wrote
After passing away, I believe we'll be judged fairly. But as for a karma system during life, I don't really think so. Everything has a cause and effect, but I don't think it equates to anything but progression in the end. Whether we're finally judged is something that can only be decided in the afterlife, the way I see it.
Teracerus wrote
That's really difficult to say, actually. I think ears are definitely the hardest for me, because I rarely pay attention to them in everyday life. I probably wouldn't realize we had ears if no one ever told me. I pay a lot of attention to those other three details, and the lines that distinguish my drawing skills for each of the parts are pretty close together. I would say the eyes are toughest after that, though. There's an incredible amount of detail that goes into drawing the eyes; even though, I look at the eyes on a face the most, I find it difficult to replicate the exact details I see. I'm not sure why that is, but I do have their raw shape down pretty well in my head. The nose is really easy, suprisingly. It's kind of weird that it would be that way, but the shape is really distinct and drawing it doesn't require much detail other than basic shadowing. The mouth is the easiest of all after that. It was initially the toughest to get down, but once you see the shapes of the two lips and how they're positioned, it's very easy to draw.
Posted on 04 April 2016 - 11:41 PM
Morsinius wrote
Hivlik wrote...
Sorry for exciting you by quoting this post of yours, but I'm doing it to tell you that I'm going to hold out on answering this question until the weekend. I've got some diagramming to do, and since school resumes tomorrow, I can't be bothered to do it right now. These new questions are pretty interesting, yk?
Posted on 05 April 2016 - 01:59 PM
You seem to have pretty well thought out opinions.. what's your opinion of me? I understand if you don't say much because I don't think you know me anyways ^-^Posted on 05 April 2016 - 03:47 PM
Well if he's doing it fuck it, what's your opinion of me? c;Posted on 06 April 2016 - 10:31 PM
IvanBnw wrote
https://i.imgur.com//LAnJ6Hg.png
The soup of the day, please. Yeah, and I'll have… some of that, thanks.
Posted on 06 April 2016 - 10:40 PM
freekkiller wrote
Will you stay on these forums and continue being a positive input?
I wish freek, but sources say that I'm high[1] on drugs[2] (crack[3] and meth[4] specifically) and I'm going through rough times.[5]
I hope I'll be cured soon.
1: https://www.badlion.net/forum/thread/103008/post/547398#547398
2: https://www.badlion.net/forum/thread/103008/post/548803#548803
3: https://www.badlion.net/forum/thread/99781/post/550343#550343
4: https://www.badlion.net/forum/thread/102755/post/545834#545834
5: https://www.badlion.net/forum/thread/102673/post/550155#550155
Posted on 07 April 2016 - 12:19 AM
JAMCM99 wrote
Haha, yeah. I swing my cane around with a stylized swagger just like you'd find in scrolling movie credits playing at dusk.
Posted on 07 April 2016 - 12:23 AM
Melonnade wrote
Yep, still do. Mice make me really comfortable and I just can't get used to clicking on those things. I wouldn't want to make a real rodent click either, come to think of it. Last thing I need for a ring finger is a pomegranate-coloured deathwish. Glad to see you're still around, though!
Posted on 07 April 2016 - 12:41 AM
doggn wrote
Art is simply the expression of creative thought. There is no correlation between art and therapuetics—if anything, modernist and post-modernist art tries to avoid the concept. Personally, art just causes me more conflict—it's fun to express myself, but it gets in the way often. Is it a form of masochism? Maybe, but it doesn't compare to my music listening habits. Have you ever tried hate-listening to a song? It makes me appreciate the music I genuinely enjoy a lot more, and it's given me nearly permanent tinnitus. Hopefully that constant ringing at 15khz eventually evolves into a nicer sounding pitch!
Last edited on 07 April 2016 - 10:08 PM by *deleted-231323
Automatically Deleted